Kerr v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas et al
| Marlon Kerr |
| Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas and Kansas City Board of Public Utilities |
| 2:2021cv02335 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr re #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 13
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 10/27/2021 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 10/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 9/1/21. (ala)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendants Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas(Low, Spencer)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendants Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas (Low, Spencer)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to Complaint by Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas.(Low, Spencer)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Marlon Kerr upon Kansas City Board of Public Utilities served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021 (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Marlon Kerr upon Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021 (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb)
|
|
Filing 7
EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr Exhibit B, Redacted. (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 6
EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr Exhibit A, Redacted. (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 5
EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr Exhibit C. (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 4
EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr Exhibit B. (Brown, Sarah) Modified on 7/30/2021 to block document which contained personal identifiers. (lb)
|
|
Filing 3
EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr Exhibit A. (Brown, Sarah) Modified on 7/30/2021 to block document which contained personal identifiers. (lb)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Marlon Kerr. (Brown, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5549580.), filed by Marlon Kerr.(Brown, Sarah)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
