Sweeney v. Ivanti, Inc. et al
| Virginia (Ginny) Sweeney |
| Ivanti, Inc. and Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. |
| 2:2021cv02540 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint, #10 Memorandum in Support of Motion , #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint Response deadline 1/27/2022. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/13/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sn)
|
|
Filing 13
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint, #10 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Plaintiff Virginia (Ginny) Sweeney (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Keenan, Edward)
|
|
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set by telephone for 2/22/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James. To join the call, counsel shall dial CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 and enter ACCESS CODE 4901386. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 2/1/2022. Report of Parties Planning Meeting and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 2/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/11/22. (ct)
|
|
Filing 11
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. identifying None as corporate parent . (DeMarea, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint by Defendant Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of J. Cannon)(DeMarea, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint by Defendant Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. (DeMarea, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 8
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL by Thomas Richard Rehorn III and ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL by Edward Emmett Keenan on behalf of Virginia (Ginny) Sweeney (Keenan, Edward)
|
|
Filing 7
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Jones on behalf of Ivanti, Inc. (Jones, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal with State Court by Ivanti, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Johnson, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ivanti, Inc. identifying Ivanti Software, Inc. as corporate parent . (Johnson, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Removal Complaint by Ivanti, Inc. (Johnson, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Ivanti, Inc. (Johnson, Daniel) 3
|
|
Filing 2
DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Ivanti, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Johnson, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Wyandotte County, KS, case number 2021-CV-000707 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5640912), filed by Ivanti, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A for Removal - Email accepting service, #2 Exhibit B - service docs, #3 State Court Records)(Johnson, Daniel) Modified on 11/19/2021 to correct state court case number (ca).
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
