Garza v. Larned State Hospital

Garza v. Larned State Hospital

Plaintiff:	Jose Garza
Defendant:	Larned State Hospital
Case Number:	5:2010cv03140
Filed:	July 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Topeka Office
County:	Pawnee
Presiding Judge:	Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 22, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $52.50. Within that same thirty (30) day period, plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint upon court-provided forms. Plaintif f's motion 4 for extension of time is granted. The time in which plaintiff must satisfy the filing fee prerequisite and submit an Amended Complaint is hereby extended for the same thirty (30) day period. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/22/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Jose Garza by regular mail.) (smnd)
July 21, 2010	Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days in which to file a proper motion to proceed without prepayment of fees that is supported by a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of t his action. Within the same twenty (20) day period, plaintiff must cure the deficiencies in his complaint by naming a proper defendant and alleging sufficient facts to state a federal constitutional violation. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/21/10. (smnd) Modified text to correct typo on 7/22/2010 (smnd).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 22, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $52.50. Within that same thirty (30) day period, plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint upon court-provided forms. Plaintif f's motion 4 for extension of time is granted. The time in which plaintiff must satisfy the filing fee prerequisite and submit an Amended Complaint is hereby extended for the same thirty (30) day period. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/22/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Jose Garza by regular mail.) (smnd)

July 21, 2010

Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days in which to file a proper motion to proceed without prepayment of fees that is supported by a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of t his action. Within the same twenty (20) day period, plaintiff must cure the deficiencies in his complaint by naming a proper defendant and alleging sufficient facts to state a federal constitutional violation. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/21/10. (smnd) Modified text to correct typo on 7/22/2010 (smnd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garza v. Larned State Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Garza
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Larned State Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?