Bowers et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
| Roy Bowers and Sheila Bowers |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Lorna Slaughter |
| 5:2010cv04141 |
| November 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Shawnee |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| David J. Waxse |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
376
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 357 Wells Fargo's Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 7/15/2013. (mss)
|
|
Filing
352
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 318 Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count III; denying 330 plaintiffs' Motion to Strike; and granting 304 Wells Fargo's Motion for Attorney Fees. PLEASE REFER TO THE ORDER FOR AN IMPORTANT RESPONSE DEADLINE. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/26/2013. (mss)
|
|
Filing
337
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 336 plaintiffs' Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/17/2012. (mss)
|
|
Filing
301
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 219 plaintiffs' Motion to Strike ; denying 221 defendant's Motion for Default Judgment; granting 224 defendants' Motion to Strike; and granting 230 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 10/4/2012. (mss)
|
|
Filing
293
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 217 First American's earlier Motion to Dismiss or For More Definite Stataement; and granting 232 Third Party Defendant First American's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 9/11/2012. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
291
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining 263 the Objection of the Defendants to the Order of the Magistrate Judge. The sanctions imposed on July 9, 2012, are hereby set aside. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 9/7/2012. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
252
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 111 Plaintiffs' Motion to Deem Requests for Admission as Insufficient. Within 20 days of this Memorandum and Order, Defendant MERS shall serve, without objection, its answers to Plain tiffs' Requests for Admission Nos. 26 (but limited to the Caveat and lost note affidavit), 34, 35, 48, 61, and 62. It is further ordered that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(g)(3), discovery sanctions in the amount of $1,000 are imposed upon the attorney who signed Defendant MERS's objections and responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admission. The sanctions shall be paid to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 7/9/2012. (byk)
|
|
Filing
189
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 103 plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss; denying 125 plaintiffs' Motion to Remand to State Court; denying 130 plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss; and denying 188 plaintiffs' Motion for Order. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/1/2012. (mss)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 126 plaintiffs' Motion for Review; and granting 142 plaintiffs' Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/31/2012. (mss)
|
|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 82 Defendants' Motion for Order of Contempt of Court or to Show Cause Why Non-Party Home Quest Mortgage, LLC Should Not Be Held in Contempt. It is further ordered that the subpoena duces tecum commanding Home Quest to produce documents dated August 5, 2011 is quashed for lack of proper service. Each party should bear its own costs associated with the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 12/22/2011. (byk)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 62 Defendants' Motion for Entry of Protective Order from Corporate Representative Deposition Notice. Defendant MERS is granted a protective order from producing any representatives to testify to Plaintiffs' Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of MERS, Duces Tecum, dated July 1, 2011. Plaintiffs may, however, serve MERS with another notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) in accordance with the rulings in this Memorandum and Order. It i s further ordered that any future Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant MERS shall be held at its principal place of business in Virginia, unless the parties otherwise agree to another location. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 12/2/2011. (byk)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s 31 MOTION to Intervene. Wells Fargo shall electronically file its proposed Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaim by 08/08/2011. Any response by Plaintiffs shall be filed by 08/29/2011. A telephone Status Conference is set for 9/12/2011 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse. Further, Plaintiffs' request for their fees in responding to the motion are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 8/3/2011. (mg)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order. In conjunction with the filing of this Order, the Court will enter a revised Protective Order limiting the parties' use, disclosure, and dissemination of confidential information and materials produced in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 8/2/2011. (byk)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses of Mortgage Electronic and granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses of Lorna Slaughter. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 6/1/2011. (mh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
