Parrish-Parrado v. Waddington et al
| Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado |
| Doug Waddington and Larned Correctional Facility |
| 5:2012cv03120 |
| May 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Pawnee |
| Richard D. Rogers |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this order to submit the $455.00 appellate filing fee to the clerk of this court. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 7/30/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed due to failure to state a claim for relief. Petitioner's motion 4 to appoint counsel and motion 8 for order are denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 7/6/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including June 18, 2012, to submit the $5.00 filing fee. The failure to pay the full filing fee by that time will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 5/18/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
