Price v. State of Kansas et al
| Jerrell Price |
| Kansas State Atty General, Dickinson County, Dickinson County Dist. Atty, Kristopher Kellim, Kansas, State of, Daryl E. Hawkins and Dickinson County Sheriff |
| 5:2012cv03227 |
| October 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including January 11, 2013, to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed based upon the prosecutorial immunity of defendant Hawkins and upon plaintiff's failure to present the c laims for relief within the two-year limitation period. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/12/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jerrell Price by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The clerk of the court shall transmit form pleadings for an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 2254 to the plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised that this matter may be dismissed if he fails to complete and return the 1983 form on or before December 3, 2012. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/1/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jerrell Price by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
