Zander v. Knight Transportation, Inc. et al
||William P. Zander
||Knight Transportation, Inc., Glen Palmer, Jason Jones, Shawn Bell, Kevin Prewitt, Michael Hitchcock and David Shobe
||February 19, 2013
||Kansas District Court
||Richard D. Rogers
||Gerald L. Rushfelt
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 14, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 30 defendants' Motion for Sanctions and other relief; Pllaintiff's amended complaint(29)shall be stricken and denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff's motion to comel and motion for sanction (doc 37 and 36)shall be denied; adopting (44) Report and Recommendations; granting 49 Motion to Amend/Correct. The court shall adopt the R&R of the Magistrate Judge. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 11/14/14. (meh)
|May 15, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 66 Motion to Compel; denying 69 Motion to Compel; denying 70 Motion to Produce. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to show cause why this Court should not award Defenda nts their reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees. See Memorandum and Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on May 15, 2015. Mailed to pro se party William P. Zander by regular mail and by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7012 3460 0000 8262 7969. (gc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.