Juarez-Galvan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gustavo M. Juarez-Galvan
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2013cv04046
Filed: April 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss by defendant. See order for further details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 1/8/2014. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juarez-Galvan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gustavo M. Juarez-Galvan
Represented By: David O. Alegria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?