Smith v. Ruskin Company et al

Defendant: Tomkins Industries and Ruskin Company
Plaintiff: Glen W. Smith
Case Number: 5:2014cv04053
Filed: June 19, 2014
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Topeka Office
County: Neosho
Referring Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Ruskin Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tomkins Industries
Represented By: Denise M. Portnoy
Represented By: David L. Wing(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruskin Company
Represented By: Denise M. Portnoy
Represented By: David L. Wing(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen W. Smith
Represented By: Heather J. Schlozman(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Mark V. Dugan(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.