King et al v. The Rib Crib BBQ, Inc.
| Jonathan King and Tyrece Edwards |
| The Rib Crib BBQ, Inc. |
| 5:2016cv04142 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Saline |
| Daniel D. Crabtree |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 104 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 105 Motion for Hearing; the court warns Mr. King: This case is closed. Any future filings like the ones decided by this Order will result in monetary sanctions against him. Mailed to pro se plaintiff Jonathan King at 1308 Midland, Salina, KS 67401 and emailed to pro se plaintiff Jonathan King at designkansas43@gmail.com. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 12/5/19. (ctv) Modified on 12/6/2019 (ctv).
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 75 Plaintiffs' Motion for Order and 78 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 11/20/2018. (mig)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/10/2017. Mailed to pro se party plaintiff Tyrece Edwards by certified mail. Certified Tracking Number: 70102780000319280772. (wh)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 48 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 9/11/2017.(wh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
