Mettille v. BNSF Railway Company
Caleb Ford Mettille |
BNSF Railway Company |
5:2020cv04072 |
November 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Toby Crouse |
Angel D Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BNSF Railway Company identifying Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC as corporate parent . (Vogel, David) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by BNSF Railway Company.(Vogel, David) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Toby Crouse for all further proceedings. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 12/10/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao) |
Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2021 at 01:30 PM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 12/30/2020. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 1/13/2021. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 1/13/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 12/2/2020. (ht) |
Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 12/18/2020 for Defendant BNSF Railway Company to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/18/2020. (jsh) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to BNSF Railway Company (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Chloe Elizabeth Davis on behalf of Caleb Ford Mettille. (Davis, Chloe) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Bruce Alan Brumley on behalf of Caleb Ford Mettille. (Brumley, Bruce) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Caleb Ford Mettille - trial to be held in Topeka. (Brumley, Bruce) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Caleb Ford Mettille. (Brumley, Bruce) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Topeka ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5313586.), filed by Caleb Ford Mettille.(Brumley, Bruce) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mettille v. BNSF Railway Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Caleb Ford Mettille | |
Represented By: | Chloe Elizabeth Davis |
Represented By: | Bruce Alan Brumley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
Represented By: | David C. Vogel |
Represented By: | Heather M. Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.