Haulmark v. State of Kansas et al
Chris Haulmark |
Tom Day, State of Kansas and Legislative Administrative Services |
5:2020cv04084 |
December 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Teresa J James |
Eric F Melgren |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12131 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (jsh) |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (ct) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE by Movant Tom Day re #12 Motion to Strike, #8 Motion to Quash ( Reply deadline 2/25/2021), REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Movant Tom Day re: #12 Motion to Strike, #8 Motion to Quash (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Willoughby, M.) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas re #5 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List Index, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Willoughby, M.) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Defendants State of Kansas and Kansas Administrative Services. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the briefing on this motion, including Plaintiff's opposition, and determines that Defendants have shown good cause for a 30-day extension of time to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. There is no indication that Defendants seek an extension in bad faith. Indeed, Defendants cite a number of extraordinary circumstances that provide ample justification for the extension requested. On the other hand, the potential prejudice to Plaintiff, if any, from the requested extension would be minimal; another Defendant also has not yet answered the Complaint (and has filed a Motion to Quash, ECF No. 8). And Plaintiff has already filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5), which is not yet fully briefed and will be decided by the District Judge. The deadline for Defendants State of Kansas and Kansas Administrative Services to file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to February 22, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/29/21. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ct) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Strike Movant Tom Day's #8 MOTION to Quash by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (jsh) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Chris Haulmark upon Tom Day. Served on 12/19/2020. Answer due 1/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jsh) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Chris Haulmark upon Derek Schmidt, Kansas Attorney General, on behalf of State of Kansas, Legislative Administrative Services, and Tom Day. Served on 12/18/2020. Answer due 1/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jsh) |
Filing 9 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas re: #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Willoughby, M.) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Quash by Movant Tom Day (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Willoughby, M.) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark re #6 Motion for Extension of Time. (mls) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Willoughby, M.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Response deadline 2/4/2021) by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (mls) |
Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 1/25/2021 for Defendant Tom Day to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/8/2021. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail. (jsh) |
Filing 3 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 1/22/2021 for Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/8/2021. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail. (jsh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark. (jsh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka filed by Chris Haulmark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List) (jsh) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tom Day, Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas. (issued to Returned to plaintiff for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 402, receipt number T4631014349. (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.