Haulmark v. State of Kansas et al
Plaintiff: Chris Haulmark
Defendant: Tom Day, State of Kansas and Legislative Administrative Services
Case Number: 5:2020cv04084
Filed: December 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Teresa J James
Referring Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (jsh)
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (ct)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE by Movant Tom Day re #12 Motion to Strike, #8 Motion to Quash ( Reply deadline 2/25/2021), REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Movant Tom Day re: #12 Motion to Strike, #8 Motion to Quash (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Willoughby, M.)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RESPONSE by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas re #5 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List Index, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Willoughby, M.)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Defendants State of Kansas and Kansas Administrative Services. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the briefing on this motion, including Plaintiff's opposition, and determines that Defendants have shown good cause for a 30-day extension of time to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. There is no indication that Defendants seek an extension in bad faith. Indeed, Defendants cite a number of extraordinary circumstances that provide ample justification for the extension requested. On the other hand, the potential prejudice to Plaintiff, if any, from the requested extension would be minimal; another Defendant also has not yet answered the Complaint (and has filed a Motion to Quash, ECF No. 8). And Plaintiff has already filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5), which is not yet fully briefed and will be decided by the District Judge. The deadline for Defendants State of Kansas and Kansas Administrative Services to file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to February 22, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/29/21. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ct)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Strike Movant Tom Day's #8 MOTION to Quash by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (jsh)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Chris Haulmark upon Tom Day. Served on 12/19/2020. Answer due 1/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jsh)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Chris Haulmark upon Derek Schmidt, Kansas Attorney General, on behalf of State of Kansas, Legislative Administrative Services, and Tom Day. Served on 12/18/2020. Answer due 1/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jsh)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas re: #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Willoughby, M.)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Quash by Movant Tom Day (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Willoughby, M.)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark re #6 Motion for Extension of Time. (mls)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint by Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Willoughby, M.)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Response deadline 2/4/2021) by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (mls)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 1/25/2021 for Defendant Tom Day to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/8/2021. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail. (jsh)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 1/22/2021 for Defendants Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/8/2021. Mailed to pro se party Chris Haulmark by regular mail. (jsh)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Chris Haulmark. (jsh)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka filed by Chris Haulmark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List) (jsh)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tom Day, Legislative Administrative Services, State of Kansas. (issued to Returned to plaintiff for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 402, receipt number T4631014349. (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haulmark v. State of Kansas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Day
Represented By: M. J. Willoughby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Kansas
Represented By: M. J. Willoughby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Legislative Administrative Services
Represented By: M. J. Willoughby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Haulmark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?