Leek (ID 63523) v. Androski et al
| Kenneth D. Leek |
| Kathryn A. Androski, (fnu) Jackson, Dan Schnurr, ICSolutions and Misti Kroeker |
| 5:2021cv03100 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Kathryn A. Androski, ICSolutions, Misti Kroeker and Dan Schnurr filed by Plaintiff Kenneth D. Leek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including June 21, 2021, to submit an amended complaint that complies with Rules 18 and 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/20/21. Mailed to pro se party Kenneth A. Leek by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 402, receipt number T4631014817. (jsh)
|
|
Filing 4
RESPONSE to #2 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Kenneth D. Leek. (jal)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Kenneth D. Leek #63523: now at Lansing Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 2, Lansing, KS 66043. (jal)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Kenneth D. Leek by regular mail. Response deadline 5/14/2021. (smnd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kenneth D. Leek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
