Rhoads v. Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc
| Jeffrey P Rhoads |
| Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc |
| 5:2022cv04005 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| John W Broomes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 4/26/2022 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 4/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 3/1/22. (ala)
|
|
Filing 8
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc identifying None as corporate parent (Mauch, Susan)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to Complaint by Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc.(Mauch, Susan)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc. answer due 2/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 2/11/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kf)
|
|
Filing 5
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Cameron Scott Bernard on behalf of Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc (Bernard, Cameron)
|
|
Filing 4
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Mauch, Susan)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Susan L. Mauch on behalf of Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc (Mauch, Susan)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ada)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Jeffrey P Rhoads. (Johnson, Alan)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Topeka (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5688166.), filed by Jeffrey P Rhoads.(Johnson, Alan)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rhoads v. Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey P Rhoads | |
| Represented By: | Alan V. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stormont Vail HealthCare, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Cameron Scott Bernard |
| Represented By: | Susan L. Mauch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
