Gilkey v. ADT Security, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Gilkey
Defendant: ADT Security, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2011cv01369
Filed: November 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: Kenneth G. Gale
Presiding Judge: Julie A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 105 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot 107 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal; denying 108 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause withintwenty-one days from the date of this Order why this Court should not impose future filing restrictions on Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 11/21/2013. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Gilkey by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7010 2780 0003 1927 0735 (mb)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 100 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 102 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 9/17/2013.Mailed to pro se party Christopher Jon Gilkey by regular mail (daw)
March 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 58 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 78 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 3/1/2013.Mailed to pro se party Christopher Gilkey, PO Box 47462, Wichita, KS 67201 by regular mail. (pp)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 53 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 8/20/2012.Mailed to pro se party plaintiff by both regular mail and certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number: 70110110000213991301 (aw)
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 38 Motion to Quash; denying 41 Motion to Compel; granting 42 Motion to Compel; granting 33 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 8/2/2012.Mailed to pro se party Christopher Gilkey by certified mail (df)
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 22 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/26/2012.Mailed to pro se party Christopher Gilkey by regular mail. (df)
May 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 29 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 5/25/2012.Mailed to pro se party Christopher Gilkey by regular mail. (pp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilkey v. ADT Security, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Gilkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADT Security, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah T. Lepak
Represented By: Michael L. Matula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?