Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC v. Hayden
| Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC |
| Shawn Hayden |
| 6:2012cv01472 |
| December 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| XX Outside US |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 5/20/2013. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC v. Hayden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC | |
| Represented By: | Marc A. Powell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shawn Hayden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
