Molina v. Perez et al
| Jacob Molina |
| Greg Perez and Karl Timmons |
| 6:2013cv01025 |
| January 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Kenneth G. Gale |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 115 plaintiff's Motion for Review. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 8/5/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 96 defendants' Renewed Motion for Qualified Immunity; and denying as moot 100 defendants' Motion for Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 2/3/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 defendants' Motion in Limine; granting 81 plaintiff's Motion to Modify; granting in part and denying in part 82 plaintiff's Motion in Limine; and granting 91 plaintiff's Motion in Limine. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/20/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 59 defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/17/14. (mss)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 18 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot 31 plaintiff's Motion for Hearing. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 11/19/2013. (mss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
