Winger v. Meade District Hospital

Plaintiff: Raymond Winger
Defendant: Meade District Hospital
Case Number: 6:2013cv01428
Filed: November 13, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Meade
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Referring Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 9, 2015 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 24 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/9/15. (mss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winger v. Meade District Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Winger
Represented By: Donald N. Peterson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meade District Hospital
Represented By: Mark A. Kanaga(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Alan L. Rupe(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.