Bowen Engineering Corporation v. Pacific Indemnity Co.,et al.
| Bowen Engineering Corporation |
| Scott Process Systems, Inc., Pacific Indemnity Co. and Walters Metal Fabrication, Inc. |
| 6:2014cv01224 |
| July 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Stevens |
| Teresa J. James |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 27 defendants' Motion to Transfer Case and 29 Motion to Dismiss Party. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/5/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 53 Defendants Scott Process Systems, Inc.'s and Pacific Indemnity Company's Motion for Leave to File Crossclaims Against Defendant Walters Metal Fabrication, Inc. and granting 59 Plaintiff Bowen Engineering Corporation's unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall electronically file its First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), Defendants Scott Process and Pacific Indemnity shall have 14 days after Plaintiff files its First Amended Complaint in which to file an answer or otherwise respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 12/8/2014. (byk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
