Means v. Goodland Regional Medical Center et al
Plaintiff: Norman Means
Defendant: Goodland Regional Medical Center and Craig Loveless
Case Number: 6:2022cv01239
Filed: October 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Gwynne E Birzer
Referring Judge: Toby Crouse
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond is extended up to and including 12/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/18/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kf)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Goodland Regional Medical Center, Craig Loveless (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Halbrook, Karen)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/28/2022 for Defendants Craig Loveless, Goodland Regional Medical Center to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 10/27/2022. (jk)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by David M. Buffo on behalf of Goodland Regional Medical Center, Craig Loveless. (Buffo, David)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Karen J. Halbrook on behalf of Goodland Regional Medical Center, Craig Loveless. (Halbrook, Karen)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Norman Means. (Harper, Kurt)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5895149.), filed by Norman Means. (Harper, Kurt)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goodland Regional Medical Center, Craig Loveless. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (kmc)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Means v. Goodland Regional Medical Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman Means
Represented By: Kurt A. Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goodland Regional Medical Center
Represented By: David M. Buffo
Represented By: Karen J. Halbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Loveless
Represented By: David M. Buffo
Represented By: Karen J. Halbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?