Kyle v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Case Number: 1:2006cv00035
Filed: March 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 217 Jury Instructions. (CDF)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 187 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion in Limine; denying 107 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 108 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 110 Motion in Limine; denying 112 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 106 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 107 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 108 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 110 Motion for Hearing; fin ding as moot 112 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 113 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 114 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 115 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 116 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 12/14/2011. cc:counsel (KJA)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/14/2011 re 66 67 Defendant's motion to preclude Plaintiff's demand for punitive damages. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to premis e the award on KRS 411.184's definition of fraud and oppression. The Court withholds its decision on whether an instruction to the jury for punitive damages is justified for NPC's alleged wanton or reckless conduct. The Court will decide this matter following the close of proof by Plaintiff. To the extent Defendant seeks to limit the evidence used during Plaintiff's case-in-chief to show its alleged wanton or reckless conduct, it may file a motion in limine prior to trial. cc: Counsel (CDF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kyle v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?