Skudnov v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Plaintiff: Boris Nickolaevich Skudnov
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Case Number: 1:2009cv00148
Filed: November 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/22/2010; the Court will dismiss this action by separate order. cc: Plaintiff pro se, Defendant (LMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skudnov v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boris Nickolaevich Skudnov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?