Karst Environmental Education and Protection, Inc v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
| Karst Environmental Education and Protection, Inc |
| FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and Jose Sepulveda |
| 1:2010cv00154 |
| October 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Warren |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/2/2011; re 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Karst Environmental Education and Protection, Inc, and 40 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jose Sepulveda. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, DN 35 , is DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, DN. 40 , is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered for the Defendant. cc:counsel (PHB)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/14/2011 re 7 MOTION to Intervene and 24 Alternative MOTION for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae filed by Fiscal Court of Warren County, Kentucky, Inter-Modal Transportation Authority, Inc., City of Bowling Green, KY. The Movants' motion to intervene as Defendants 7 is DENIED. An appropriate order shall issue. The Movants' motion for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae 24 is GRANTED. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
