Saxton v. Harrison et al
| Mitchell Ray Saxton |
| Sam Phillips, Martha Harrison, Vicky Kristensen and Nancy Roberts |
| 1:2012cv00141 |
| August 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Simpson |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/13/2013. Because Plaintiff failed to comply with two Orders of this Court, the Court concludes that he has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. Therefore, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. cc: Defendants, Plaintiff (Pro Se) (TJD)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 11/6/2012 denying 5 Motion Appointment of Federal Judge. IT IS ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiff must complete a new application to pr oceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff is WARNED that his failure to file the new application within the time allotted will result in dismissal of action for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send the Plaintiff a new non-prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of filing fee. cc:counsel, Plaintiff, pro se. (PHB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
