Ricchuite v. Johnson et al
Carl Watson Ricchuite |
Joey Johnson, Todd County, Kentucky, Jimmy Berghammer, Curtis Crick and Unknown Defendants |
1:2014cv00104 |
August 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Todd |
Thomas B. Russell |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/8/2017 - Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (DN 67, 71, 72) are GRANTED, and Defendants' Motions to Supplement (DN 87, 88, 89) are DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel(DAK) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/24/2015; For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Curtis Crick's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order of July 13, 2015 (DN 51 ) and Jimmy Berghammer's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order of July 13, 2015 (DN 52 ) are OVERRULED, and the Magistrate Judge's Order (DN 48 ) is AFFIRMED. cc: Counsel (CDR) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/20/2014. Ricchuite's state law claims against Todd County and Johnson in his official capacity are barred by sovereign immunity and are dismissed. Ricchuite has pled sufficient facts to state a § 1983 claim against Todd County and Johnson in his official capacity. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 4 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. cc: Counsel (CDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.