Crouch et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
| Larry Crouch, Rhonda Mae Crouch, Teddy Lee Hudson and Carolyn Sue Hudson |
| Honeywell International, Inc., Textron Inc, Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., John Jewell Aircraft, Inc., Aircraft Specialties Services, Inc., Crankcase Services USA, Ltd., Mike's Aircraft Fuel Metering Service, Inc., Electronics International, Inc. and George A. Durham, Jr. |
| 3:2007cv00638 |
| November 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Graves |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
577
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay (EBOC). Defendant's omnibus motion in limine (DN 502 ) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth. cc: Counsel(JAC)
|
|
Filing
576
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay granting 501 Motion in Limine to preclude Plaintiffs from presenting at trial any expected or estimated costs of medical expenses. Insofar as Plaintiffs' response (DN 509 ) amounts to a request that Mr. Sink or any other expert witness be permitted to supplement his expert report at this late date, such request is denied. cc: Counsel(JAC)
|
|
Filing
565
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. John Jewell Aircraft, Inc.'s motion for reconsideration (DN 544 ) of the Court's order excluding the expert opinion of Doug Stimpson regarding alternative landing sites is denied. cc: Counsel (JAC)
|
|
Filing
563
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 3/18/2016 - Motion for Reconsideration 539 is DENIED. cc: Counsel(DAK)
|
|
Filing
536
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. For reasons set forth, John Jewell Aircraft, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (DN 470 ) is denied. cc: Counsel (JAC)
|
|
Filing
532
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. For reasons set forth, the Motion to Exclude (DN 423 ) is granted. cc: Counsel (JAC)
|
|
Filing
379
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer on 9/30/2014; Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 1/9/2015. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 10/31/2014. Daubert Motion due by 2/27/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 4/10/2015. 357 Motion to Stay, 364 Motion to Strike, 377 Motion for Hearing 331 Motion to Strike DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to to re-file similar motions should circustamces warrant. cc: Counsel(TLB)
|
|
Filing
327
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer on 9/17/2013 granting in part and denying in part 318 Motion for Protective Order. The court will DENY plaintiffs motion with respect to requests for admission numbers 9, 15-19, 21-29, 31-41, and 45-48, but will otherwise GRANT the motion. Plaintiffs shall have thirty days from the date of entry of this order to admit or deny each request for admission identified above. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
280
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/27/2012; 276 motion for clarification of Rule 54(b) certification set forth in this courts order of November 1, 2010 is GRANTED. The conclusions rendered in this Memorandum Opinion and Order are provided to clarify the Rule 54(b)certification in the order of this court entered November 1, 2010.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
273
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/27/12; re 263 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Complaint; motion to file a third-party complaint will be granted by separate order.cc:counsel (MLG)
|
|
Filing
247
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/16/11; Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint will be denied; The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration will be denied; A separate order will issue in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (JBM)
|
|
Filing
217
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 10/29/2010 re 211 MOTION for Reconsideration of 208 Memorandum Opinion and 209 Order. For the reasons set forth, the portions of the the prior Opinion that do not conform with this Opinion will be stricken, and AVCO's Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED. A separate Order will issue in accordance with this Opinion.cc: Counsel; Defendant Durham, pro se (RLK) Modified on 11/1/2010: cc (RLK).
|
|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/9/2010 re 168 Motion for Summary Judgment. A separate order will issue in conformance with this opinion. cc: Counsel (AEP)
|
|
Filing
177
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/28/2010 re 147 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., and 149 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by John Jewell Aircraft, Inc. Court will issue a separate Order in accordance with this Opinion.cc: Counsel, pro se Defendant (RLK) Modified on 1/29/2010: cc (RLK).
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/25/09;denying with leave to reinstate 41 Motion to Dismiss; 68 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; 84 Motion to Dismiss; 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; parties granted 90 days from entry of this order to engage in jurisdictional discovery; parties may refile their dismissal motions upon expiration of ltd discovery period. cc:counsel (MLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
