Kirkpatrick v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company

Plaintiff: James Allen Kirkpatrick
Defendant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv00227
Filed: February 22, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 5, 2014 42 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED.--- Related to DN# 34, 35 & 37. Signed by Senior Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 9/4/2014. cc: Counsel(JBM) Modified text on 9/5/2014 (JBM). Modified on 9/5/2014 (ARM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirkpatrick v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Allen Kirkpatrick
Represented By: C. Thomas Hectus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Represented By: Mark J. Gomsak
Represented By: Cynthia Blevins Doll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.