Matthews v. Roberts

Defendant: Jessica Brown Roberts
Plaintiff: Elaine Matthews
Case Number: 3:2013cv00503
Filed: May 20, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Nelson
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 14, 2014 83 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/13/2014; re 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jessica Brown Roberts ; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA)
March 17, 2014 95 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 86 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/17/2014. cc:counsel (KJA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jessica Brown Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elaine Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.