Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Defendant: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Case Number: 3:2013cv00624
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Referring Judge: Dave Whalin
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 16, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/16/13: re 10 MOTION to Remand filed by Commonwealth of Kentucky. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED . In this case, when all the factors are considered, it seems clear to the Court that Defendants have failed to prove that there is a disputed, substantial federal questionor that the resolution of the question in federal court will not upset Congresss balancing of judicial responsibilities. The Commonwealths motion to remand is thus GRANTED. cc:counsel, Jefferson Circuit Court(Div III) (DJT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Represented By: Edward M. Posner(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Charles M. Pritchett, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Theresa A. Canaday(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Sheryl G. Snyder(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Represented By: Sheryl G. Snyder(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Charles M. Pritchett, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Edward M. Posner(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Theresa A. Canaday(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Represented By: Theresa A. Canaday(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Edward M. Posner(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Charles M. Pritchett, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Sheryl G. Snyder(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Represented By: Tad Thomas(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Sean J. Riley(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Todd E. Leatherman(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Clay A. Barkley(Designation Retained)
Represented By: LeeAnne Applegate(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Aaron Ament(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.