Catoe v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
John Robert Catoe |
Hardin County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners, Christy Abrey, R. Reynolds and Danny Allen |
3:2014cv00494 |
July 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Hardin |
Thomas B. Russell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 2/2/2015 - Because Plaintiff has failed to take any action in this case subsequent to filing the documents initiating this action, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. The Court will dismiss the action by separate Order.cc:counsel, Plaintiff-pro se (DAK) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. IT IS ORDERED that the Eighth Amendment delay-in-medical-treatment claim against Defendant Abrey in her individual-capacity shall proceed beyond initial review of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove Defendants HCDC, SHP, Reynolds, and Allen from the docket of this action. A separate Scheduling Order will be entered governing the development of the continuing claim. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Hardin County Atty (JLS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.