Marquez-Warner et al v. Campus Crest at Louisville, LLC et al
| Melissa Marquez-Warner and Regina Wiley |
| Campus Crest at Louisville, LLC, Campus Crest Construction, Inc., Campus Crest Development, Inc., Titan Electric of Kentucky, LLC, DM Masonry, Inc. and Hardhat Workforce Solutions, LLC |
| 3:2015cv00172 |
| February 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 3/27/2018. Titan Electric of Kentucky, LLCs motion for summary judgment (D.N. 89 ) is GRANTED. Campus Crest Construction, Inc.; Campus Crest at Louisville, LLC; and Campus Crest Development, Inc.s motion for summary judgment (D.N. 101 ) is GRANTED. JCR Company, Inc.s motion for summary judgment (D.N. 108 ) is DENIED. Bigford Enterprises, Inc.s motion for summary judgment (D.N. 128 ) is GRANTED. cc:counsel (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 9/26/2016; for the reasons stated for in this opinion; ORDERED that HardHats Motion for Summary Judgment (D.N. 63) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against HardHat are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate HardHat Workforce Solutions, LLC as a defendant in this matter.cc:counsel (ARM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
