Martin & Bayley, Inc. et al v. O'Bryan, Brown & Toner et al
| Martin & Bayley, Inc. and Acuity A Mutual Insurance Co |
| O'Bryan, Brown & Toner and Michael P. Reilly |
| 3:2015cv00225 |
| March 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Justin R. Walker on 1/31/2020 granting 158 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the indemnity, contribution, and apportionment claims filed by USI Insurance Services Nati onal, Inc.; Old National Insurance; and Roland Lehnus (together, Insurance Defendants) against the O'Bryan Brown & Toner Defendants. The Court also DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the O'Bryan Brown & Toner Defendants' indemnity, contributi on, and apportionment claims against the Insurance Defendants. Under Rule 56(f), the Court provides notice that it may enter judgment in the Defendants' favor on the unjust enrichment claim filed by Martin & Bayley, Inc. and Acuity (together, "Plaintiffs"). Plaintiffs' deadline for responding to this notice or withdrawing that claim is 2/21/2020. Replies, if any, are due 3/6/2020. The Court ORDERS the parties to participate in a settlement conference in spring 2020 with Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. cc: Counsel(JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
