O'Neal v. Ecklerle
Plaintiff: Antonio O'Neal
Defendant: Judge Audra Ecklerle
Case Number: 3:2020cv00821
Filed: December 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 12/29/2020. The instant action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The is a final order. The Court further certifies an appeal in this action would be frivolous and not be taken in good faith.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant (JWM)
December 29, 2020 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 12/29/2020. The Court finds that Defendant is entitled to judicial immunity as to Plaintiff'sindividual-capacity claims against her and, therefore, will dismiss such claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant (JWM)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 12/23/2020; Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma Pauperis. Denying as moot #3 Motion for leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. LMDC to collect filing fee from Plaintiff's inmate prison trust account; The Clerk is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Finance, LMDC- Inmate Accounts (ALS).
December 21, 2020 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio O'Neal, #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio O'Neal, pro se (JWM)
December 21, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio O'Neal, pro se (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JWM) Modified to edit event/text on 12/22/2020 (JWM).
December 21, 2020 Response to #4 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Antonio O'Neal. (JWM)
December 8, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Reason for Deficiency: Prison Trust Account Statement Required. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/7/2021. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (JWM)
December 8, 2020 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM)
December 7, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio O'Neal, pro se (JWM)
December 7, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Audra Ecklerle, filed by Antonio O'Neal, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Misc Attachment, #2 Summons) (JWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Neal v. Ecklerle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio O'Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Audra Ecklerle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?