McCormick v. Floyd et al
| Damon McCormick |
| Mel Floyd, Lea Unknown and Mrs. Gibson |
| 4:2014cv00082 |
| August 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Hickman |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. As all claims raised in Plaintiff's complaint have been dismissed and no amendment has been filed, the Court will dismiss the action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Henderson Co. Atty. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. On initial review of the complaint, IT IS ORDERED that the claims against Defendants Cpt. Floyd, Nurse Lea, and Col. Gibson in their official capacity are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may amend the complaint (see Order for specifics). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form and summons forms to Plaintiff for his use should he wish to amend the complaint. Should Plaintiff file no amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will enter a final Order dismissing the entire action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Henderson Co. Atty. (JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
