Smith v. Coy et al
| Donald Lee Smith |
| Coy, Lampton, Jodie Blake and Joe Blue |
| 4:2015cv00059 |
| April 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Hopkins |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. The Court having dismissed the claims against all Defendants on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and Plaintiff having failed to keep the Court advised of his address, the Court will dismiss the entire action by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (JLS)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 11/2/2015: Claims against the HCJ and Defendants Coy, Lampton, Blake, and Blue in their official capacity are DISMISSED; Within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opin ion and Order, Plaintiff may amend the complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place the instant case number and Amended on a § 1983 complaint form and send it, along with six blank summons forms, to Plaintiff for his use should he wish to amend the complaint. Should Plaintiff file no amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will enter a final Order dismissing the entire action. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) w/forms, Defendants, HCA (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
