Harper et al v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
| Lana Michele Harper, Ashley Lambert and Jessica Peak |
| Daviess County, Kentucky, David Osborne, Chad Payne, David Boarman, Unknown John and/or Jane Does, Green River Regional Mental Health, Mental Retardation Board, Inc. and Rebecca Moorman |
| 4:2015cv00068 |
| May 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Daviess |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 2/15/2018: The motion 49 for summary judgment by Green River Regional Mental Health-Mental Retardation Board d/b/a River Valley Behavioral Health and Rebecca Moorman is GRANTED as to Count VII for negligence/wrongful death. The motion 59 for summary judgment by Daviess County, Kentucky; David Osborne, individually and in his official capacity as the Daviess County Jailer; Chad Payne, individually and in his o fficial capacity as an officer, employee, and/or agent of the Daviess County Detention Center; and David Luke Boarman, individually and in his official capacity as an officer, employee, and/or agent of the Daviess County Detention Center is GRANTED. Defendants Daviess County, Osborne, Payne, and Boarman are DISMISSED from the action. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
