Sutton v. Housing Authority of Hickman, Kentucky
Plaintiff: Freddie Sutton
Defendant: Housing Authority of Hickman, Kentucky
Case Number: 5:2014cv00161
Filed: August 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/18/2016 denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment cc: Counsel(KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Housing Authority of Hickman, Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddie Sutton
Represented By: L. Jeff Bloomfield
Represented By: Brian S. Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Housing Authority of Hickman, Kentucky
Represented By: Frank Hampton Moore, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?