Sublett v. Henson et al
Plaintiff: Damien A. Sublett
Defendant: George Henson, Kentucky Department of Corrections and Kentucky State Penitentiary
Case Number: 5:2016cv00184
Filed: November 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Lyon
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/11/2021. Denying 122 Motion for Reconsideration. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se(KJA)
March 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/17/2020. re 95 MOTION for Sanctions . A separate order and judgment shall issue.cc:counsel, plaintiff pro se (KJA)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/15/2018. Denying 42 Motion to Compel; denying 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Compel; denying 47 Motion ; denying 49 Motion for Sanctions; denying 53 Motion ; denying 65 Motion ; denying 66 Motion. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se (KJA)
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/27/2017. Plaintiff's claims against the KDOC, KSP, and the official-capacity claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED. The claims against Defendants Grief, Lan, Ford, Ma rtin, Hope, Smith, and Gibbs are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants KDOC, KSP, Grief, Lan, Ford, Martin, Hope, Smith, and Gibbs as parties to the action. The Court has allowed claims to proceed against Charles D. Crick and Webber, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add these individuals as Defendants in the docket sheet. The Court will enter a separate Order Directing Service and Scheduling Order to govern the claims that have been permitted to proceed. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; General Counsel, JPSC (CDR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sublett v. Henson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damien A. Sublett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Henson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky State Penitentiary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?