Blanchard et al v. Lonero et al
2:2006cv04023 |
July 31, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Stanwood R. Duval |
Daniel E. Knowles |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0034 Other Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 218 ORDER & OPINION granting in part and denying in part 206 Motion for New Trial or alternatively Motion for Reconsideration and/or relief from Judgment re 204 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 3/24/2010. (gbw, ) |
Filing 217 ORDER granting 216 Motion to Dismiss Third Party Demand. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 10/13/09. (blg) |
Filing 204 ORDER granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment and 185 Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of defendants Gregory Lonero, Michael Pizzolato, Michael Miller, and Sheriff Newell Normand and against plaintiffs Julie Blanchard, Sophisticated Salads, L.L.C. and 10-40 Diner, Inc. dismissing with prejudice all of plaintiffs' claims. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr. (gec, ) |
Filing 160 ORDER AND OPINION denying 132 MOTION Production of Expunged Record filed by Gregory J. Lonero. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 1/6/09.(blg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Blanchard et al v. Lonero et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.