Marquette Transportation Co., Inc. et al v. Eagle Subaru et al
| 2:2006cv09053 |
| October 26, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Peter Beer |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Marine |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 Cause Code Unknown |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER & REASONS re plas' and dft AET Inc. Ltd.'s Motions in Limine (R.Doc. #90, #91 and #88): For the reasons stated, AET's 88 motion in limine to exclude evidence of 2009 meetings between other vessels is GRANTED; Plas' 90 mo tion in limine to admit in evidence all PortVision AIS DATA subject to its limitations and mistakes is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to exclude the PortVision representation of the Bruce on January 20, 2009, and it is otherwise DENIED; Plas' 91 motion in limine to admit the expert report of Larry Earl Strouse is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/15/2010. (rll, ) Modified on 4/15/2010 to edit doc type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER finding as moot 36 Motion to Strike Second Navigation Expert Witness. Signed by Judge Peter Beer. (blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marquette Transportation Co., Inc. et al v. Eagle Subaru et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
