Constant v. Stewart et al
Plaintiff: William Constant and Jack Stewart, Jr.
Defendant: Craig Webre and Drake Landry
Case Number: 2:2007cv03042
Filed: May 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Lafourche
Presiding Judge: Helen G. Berrigan
Presiding Judge: Alma L. Chasez
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER & REASONS granting 149 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff LaThaniel Jackson for failure to appear at scheduled depositions. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/12/10. (plh, ) Modified doc type on 10/12/2010 (plh, ).
June 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER & REASONS denying 125 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion to Strike affirmative defense; FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part 126 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 6/1/10. (plh, )
September 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER and REASONS - Ordered that the plaintiffs claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act are severed from the other claims and that the Fair Labor Standards Act claims shall proceed in this suit bearing case number 07-3042; FURTHER ORDERED that plai ntiffs counsel shall, within 30 days of this order,file an amended complaint in this case bearing number 07-3042 asserting the plaintiffs Fair Labor Standards Act claims as set forth in document; FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Drake Landry may, wit hin 30 days of thisorder, file a complaint in this court asserting the 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims as set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall serve each new complaint or amended complaint and summons with a copy of the original complaint and a copy of this order on opposing counsel and on each defendant not yet having appeared in the litigation as set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED that the defamation claims asserted by William Constant and Jack Stewart against Drake Landry are dismissed without prejudice as set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 9/15/08.(plh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Constant v. Stewart et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Constant
Represented By: Lauren Ledet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Stewart, Jr.
Represented By: Lauren Ledet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Webre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drake Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?