Higgins v. Cain
| N Burl Cain |
| Kealo Higgins |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2007cv09729 |
| January 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| West Feliciana |
| G. Thomas Porteous |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 ; ORDERED that Kealo Higgins's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 1/17/2013.(blg)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER AND REASONS granting 22 MOTION for Reconsideration re 18 Judgment filed by Kealo Higgins. The captioned matter is once more REFERRED to the U.S. Magistrate Judge for consideration of the merits of the petition. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 8/13/2012. (NEF sent to Magistrate Judge Roby) (blg)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 . Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(car, )
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Kealo Higgins RECOMMENDING that petition for writ h/c be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred. Objections to R&R due by 12/17/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 12/3/2010.(rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
