Allied Van Lines Inc et al v. Fairfield Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Allied Van Lines Inc and Transguard Insurance Company of America
Defendant: Fairfield Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv01045
Filed: February 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Kurt D. Engelhardt
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that "Plaintiffs' Motion for New Trial/Reconsideration Pursuant to FRCP 59" 95 is DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 10/21/2010. (cab)
March 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment 63 is GRANTED. Defendant Fairfield Insurance Company is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and this matter is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, at Plaintiff's costs as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/23/2010. (cab)
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider 24 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Fairfield shall file its answer or other responsive pleading within 10 days of notice of this Order and that the motion for summary judgment 31 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant's ability to bring a similarly argued motion after the commencement of discovery as stated herein. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 2/25/09. (cab)
November 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER and REASONS - Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss 7 pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), or alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment, by Defendant Fairfield Insurance Company ("Fairfield"). Fairfield claims that the instant suit is barred by the application of the doctrine of res judicata. Because the Court has confined its examination of the record solely to the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto, the Court proceeds under Rule 12(b)(6). After considering the pleadings, the memoranda, and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED for the reasons stated herein. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/4/08. (cab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allied Van Lines Inc et al v. Fairfield Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allied Van Lines Inc
Represented By: John William Waters, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Transguard Insurance Company of America
Represented By: John William Waters, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fairfield Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?