Bryan v. Wood Enterprises
Plaintiff: William J. Bryan
Defendant: Wood Enterprises
Case Number: 2:2008cv03928
Filed: July 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Helen G. Berrigan
Presiding Judge: Alma L. Chasez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER & REASONS granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 9/27/10. (plh, )
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER AND REASONS denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 3/2/2010. (ecm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan v. Wood Enterprises
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William J. Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wood Enterprises
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?