Tyson v. Tanner et al
Antonio Tyson |
Robert C Tanner, Jeffrey Travis, James LeBlanc, Richard Stalder, Tim Crawford and Wade Rigdon |
2:2008cv04445 |
September 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Washington |
Lance M Africk |
Karen Wells Roby |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 224 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 220 - the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. No. 173) filed by the defendants, Warden Robert Tanner, former Warden Jeffrey Travis, Major Tim Crawford, and Captain Wade Rigdon, is GRANTED; FURTHER ORDERE D that Tyson's Motion for Counter-Defense (Rec. Doc. No. 167), Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. No. 175), Motion to Compel (Rec. Doc. No. 184), Motion to Rule on Class-Action Certification (Rec. Doc. No. 186), and Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. No. 187) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(car, ) |
Filing 213 ORDER denying 207 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, ) |
Filing 202 ORDER & REASONS denying pla's 185 Motion to Clarify Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 11/4/2010. (rll, ) Modified on 11/5/2010 to edit doc type (rll, ). |
Filing 164 ORDER denying 149 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, ) |
Filing 154 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 146 , OVERRULES 152 MOTION for APPEAL/REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court filed by Antonio Tyson and denying 123 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Antonio Tyson. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 8/19/2010.(caa, ) |
Filing 135 ORDER denying 124 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 6/24/2010. (rll, ) |
Filing 131 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 114 - Tyson's Motion Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. No. 54) is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(car, ) |
Filing 126 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 101 , 106 granting in part and denying in part the 44 Motion for partial dismissal. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, ) |
Filing 115 ORDER dismissing 87 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; denying 95 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; denying 96 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, ) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying pla's 56 Motion for Reconsideration as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 1/5/2010. (rll, ) |
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 . Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(car, ) |
Filing 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 34 MOTION for Review of pla's claims under 42 USC 1915A filed by Robert C Tanner, Wade Rigdon, Jeffrey Travis, Tim Crawford: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion be DENIED; FURTHER RECOMMENDATION for dismissal of certain claims as set forth therein. Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 8/7/09.(rll, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 . Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(cms, ) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 10/31/08.(gec, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.