Tyson v. Tanner et al
| Antonio Tyson |
| Robert C Tanner, William Deering, Christopher Mitchell, James Seal, Kevin Luper and Jeff Williams |
| 2:2008cv04599 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Washington |
| Helen G. Berrigan |
| Sally Shushan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER & REASONS denying 34 Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 8/11/10. (plh, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 . ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Lieutenant Thomas Mitchell and Sergeant Brandon are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's federal claims against Warden Robert C Tanner, Lieutenant William Deering, Sergeant Christopher Mitchell, Sergeant James Seal, Captain Kevin Luper, Major Jeff Williams, Sergeant Larry Weary, Sergeant Jeffrey Primes, Sergeant Charles Griffin, Sergeant Thomas Margiotta, Assistant Warden B ickham and Lisa Ard are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 25 MOTION to Amend/Correct 23 Objection to Report and Recommendations is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 8/25/09.(plh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
