Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. et al v. Arrow Engine Company
||Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc., PCM Leasing, LLC, PHL Manufacturing, LLC and PHL Leasing, LLC
||Arrow Engine Company
||November 14, 2008
||Louisiana Eastern District Court
||Contract Product Liability Office
||Karen Wells Roby
||Sarah S. Vance
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 16, 2010
ORDER & REASONS re dft's 31 MOTION to Dismiss Case, or Alternatively, to Continue Trial, and for Sanctions: for the reasons stated, the Court DENIES motion for dismissal and GRANTS motion for a continuance; Court also Orders plas' to resp ond to dft's discovery within 10 days of entry of this order; Court further Orders dft to submit evidence of the reasonable expenses incurred in filing the motion to compel and the instant motion within 7 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/16/2010.(rll, ) Modified on 4/16/2010 to edit doc type (rll, ).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER