Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc. et al v. Arrow Engine Company
||Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc., PCM Leasing, LLC, PHL Manufacturing, LLC and PHL Leasing, LLC
||Arrow Engine Company
||November 14, 2008
||Louisiana Eastern District Court
||Contract Product Liability Office
||Karen Wells Roby
||Sarah S. Vance
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 16, 2010
ORDER & REASONS re dft's 31 MOTION to Dismiss Case, or Alternatively, to Continue Trial, and for Sanctions: for the reasons stated, the Court DENIES motion for dismissal and GRANTS motion for a continuance; Court also Orders plas' to resp ond to dft's discovery within 10 days of entry of this order; Court further Orders dft to submit evidence of the reasonable expenses incurred in filing the motion to compel and the instant motion within 7 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/16/2010.(rll, ) Modified on 4/16/2010 to edit doc type (rll, ).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.