Wetzel v. St Tammany Parish et al
| Andrew David Wetzel |
| Sheriff Office of St Tammany Parish, Jack Strain, Jr, Gregory Longino, James Franklinton, St Tammany Parish and Jail St Tammany Parish |
| 2:2008cv04942 |
| November 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Out of State |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER - Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs' objections, and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judges' Reports and Recommendations 37 as the rulings of the Court on these motions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in Civil Action Number 08-4942 (Rec. Doc. 1) against all remaining defendants be and hereby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/27/2012.(cab)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff. Having considered the motions, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment" 41 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Order of Records" 42 is DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/28/2010. (cab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
