Hardy v. Shell Oil Company
Plaintiff: William Hardy
Defendant: Shell Oil Company
Case Number: 2:2009cv03189
Filed: March 31, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Lance M Africk
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardy v. Shell Oil Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Hardy
Represented By: Dan Michael Scheuermann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shell Oil Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?