Ellzey v. Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans
| Sharon Ellzey |
| Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans |
| United States of America |
| 2:2010cv00900 |
| March 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER and REASONS - Considering the May 25, 2013 statement of no opposition (Rec. Doc. 29) filed by Relator, Sharon Ellzey, and the May 29, 2013 statement of consent by the United States provided to the Court, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment 26 is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Relator's retaliatory discharge claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/30/2013. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER and REASONS denying 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/13/2012. (cab)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/11/2012. (cab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
